A COX DNA MATCH
We have obtained our first match for our particular Cox Y-chromosome DNA. The
match is with a descendant of an Ephraim Cox who settled in Rowan County, North
Carolina by 1753, through Ephraim’s son Moses Cox. There are three things that
can be said about this, at this point: (1) it is certain that the members of the
Ephraim Cox family are our distant cousins, (2) it is highly likely that both
families descend from Peter Larsson Cock, the Swede who settled along the
Delaware River in 1641, and (3) it is unclear exactly how we descend from Peter
Larsson Cock. Still, this is a major step forward, as there had not previously
been any clear indication as to which Cox family we belonged.
The marker by marker comparison for descendants of Joseph, James and Moses Cox
(sons of John) and Ephraim Cox is shown below:
|
393 |
390 |
19 |
391 |
385a |
385b |
426 |
388 |
439 |
389-1 |
392 |
389-2 |
Joseph |
14 |
23 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
14 |
14 |
30 |
James |
14 |
23 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
14 |
14 |
30 |
Moses |
14 |
23 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
14 |
14 |
30 |
Ephraim |
14 |
23 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
14 |
14 |
30 |
458 |
459a |
459b |
455 |
454 |
447 |
437 |
448 |
449 |
464a |
464b |
464c |
464d |
16 |
10 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
25 |
14 |
19 |
28 |
14 |
14 |
15 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
10 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
25 |
14 |
19 |
29 |
14 |
14 |
15 |
15 |
As is evident from the chart, all four testees match exactly for the first 12
markers. Only the Joseph and Ephraim descendants have been tested to 25 markers
(a test upgrade for James is pending). There is a 24/25 match at that level. If
no other information were known, that level of match would suggest about a 50%
likelihood of a common ancestor within 7 generations and about a 90% chance of a
common ancestor within 16 generations. As 16 generations represents about 500
years, there is very little doubt that we derive from the same family as the
Ephraim Cox descendants.
Nancy Kiser, who arranged for the Ephraim Cox descendant to be tested,
identifies her Ephraim as the same Ephraim who was baptized in Chester County,
Pennsylvania in 1705, a son of Gabriel Peterson Cock and grandson of the Swedish
immigrant, Peter Larsson Cock. Dr. Peter Stebbins Craig, the leading expert on
the settlers of New Sweden on the Delaware, concurs in that identification. The
evidence is circumstantial, but very likely. Ephraim Cox disappears from New
Jersey at about the same time that an Ephraim Cox appears in Rowan County. The
Ephraim Cox of Rowan County seems to have had sons named Moses, Israel, Ephraim
and possibly Isaac, which were all names associated with the family of the New
Jersey Ephraim. A number of New Jersey settlers from Swedish and Finnish
families went to Rowan County, at least some of whom Ephraim seems to have
associated with. A 19th Century newspaper article by an Ephraim descendant
indicates that Ephraim came to North Carolina from New Jersey. If it is correct
that Ephraim descended from Peter Larsson Cock, then we surely did also. Just
the fact that our type of sequence belongs to the N haplogroup points toward a
Scandinavian background, as that haplogroup was far more prevalent among Finns
and Swedes than it was in the British Isles. An additional proven descendant of
Peter Larsson Cock is currently being sought for a corroborative test.
Identifying our line of descent from Peter Larsson Cock will take further
research. Peter had five sons, although the best candidates for our line of
descent are through his son Gabriel Petersson Cock/Cox. For background on both
the Peter and Gabriel families, refer to Bud Thomas’s articles in issues 19 and
21 of the Cox Newsletter.
See also the account of
Peter Larsson Cock
(Cox) by Dr. Peter Stebbins Craig.
In 1956, Rosalie Fellows Bailey, a noted genealogist hired by
Narcissa (Cox) Vanderlip, suggested the potential relevance of the family of an
Ezekiel Cox, son of David Cox and grandson of Gabriel Cox. This family included
an Abraham Cox (the name given as John’s father by his granddaughter, Mary (Cox)
Freeland), who settled in West Virginia, although this Abraham was about the
same age as John, and could not have been his father. Internet listings of
Ezekiel’s family by various genealogists mention ten children, none of them
named John. Ezekiel Cox had a brother Joseph, who is an attractive candidate to
be our ancestor, in that our John Cox named his eldest son Joseph. However,
Internet data provides no information about Joseph, other than his apparent
birthdate of 1735.
Traditional genealogical research in conventional records will be necessary to
attempt to confirm our line of descent, but at least we have, for the first
time, evidence as to which Cox family we belong.
Back to Cox Home Page